Register    Login

Recent Comments

Regulators adopt new attitudes toward financing
Excellent recap of what is happening to us! by Bernie
It's Tax Day -- Let's party like we work for GSA!
I consider myself a reasonably smart human being, but no matter how much I read about this government and how f'd up it is no one seams to have the answers. Can anyone tell me what else I can do, as a hard working American who is sick to his stomach, besides vote, because that isn't enough. I know the problem, tell me the answer. My thought is it will take someone with the biggest set of balls known to mankind to clean house. Looking for some answers, and I am all ears by Joseph Bullyan
It's Tax Day -- Let's party like we work for GSA!
And we wonder why our budget is out of control?!!? OMG!!!! We are to blame though - we keep electing the same members to the most exclusive country club in the world! They are exempt from most laws, get everything paid for by the taxpayer and are set for life - while we just keep struggling to pay them for that luxury!Worse, our two presidential candidates will raise over half a BILLION Dollars to convince us to vote for them! Actually worse - we'll contribute to them and elect them!Shame on us ... by Bernie
Australia, Europe, China . . . . pick two!
It would be interesting to know what the Board members that didn't vote yes on going into China thought and are they RV mfg. or suppliers? If any of them are suppliers they must have all their products made there already! by Tony
Australia, Europe, China . . . . pick two!
As a follow-up on this discussion, there was a very interesting article in the Washington Post last week and it was reprinted in the Boston Sunday Globe this past weekend. The article is titled: "China may buy only domestic cars for official use." You can read the article at: http://b.globe.com/GTIu6A Many of the comments at the Post and Globe indicate that there is nothing wrong with a country doing this - and I agree with them. We do the same thing here in America at the federal and state ... by Bob Zagami
Australia, Europe, China . . . . pick two!
As always, Bob has done his homework and presents a great editorial. I just can't see any benefit to having anything to do with The "China" Connection. I can't think of any Industry that has actually "benefited" it's American workers by joining with China.An American purchaser of an RV has multiple choices of types, options and price already! Why add an Asian Product to that mix - that will only hurt American made products - as it always has in the past. High tech products are mass produced and ... by Bernie
Australia, Europe, China . . . . pick two!
Bob, you’re right on!

The Chinese government cannot be trusted and they abuse their people terribly. If an RV manufacture decides to “dance” with a partner in China, it will be the fire dance, and it won’t be China that gets burned!
by Barry Hughes
The Chinese even knock off websites
I don't see a major problem with it.I just type the name then hit Ctrl & Enter and it goes to the dot com.Can not see why I would even type dot com then dot cn. by Wayne
The Chinese even knock off websites
This trick happens in all countries. Not limitied to China. It's cyber siting and tech it is illegal but that doesn't stop anyone from doing it.

If you are building a "brand" you often want to buy every version of your domain. Because even if you can get all of those domains back with the law from the people sitting on them it is just safer to own them all up front if you can.

by Aaron
Australia, Europe, China . . . . pick two!
Point of clarification from Jim this morning, the China Committee vote was unanimous but the Board of Directors vote was not.

Also, the sentence in the third pargraph from the bottom should have read, "We will continue to monitor China, not to prove somebody wrong, but to honestly report the information we get on the abuses we expect to see despite the best laid plans of RVIA." by Bob Zagami
 

Current Editorials

Current Articles | Archives | Search

 

Wednesday, January 11, 2012
FEMA: The beginning of the end to the RV industry
By Guest Blogger @ 5:31 PM :: :: 13 Comments :: Article Rating
 

By Jimmy Bankston

As everyone in the RV industry, park model industry and the mobile home industry knows, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) had purchased more than 100,000 units following Hurricane Katrina. At that time FEMA purchased what it could from dealerships and manufacturers from all industries.

However, FEMA is better prepared now. They have contracts with a select few manufactures the mobile home industries or with companies affiliated with the Recreational Park Trailer Industry Association. Sorry RV dealers, FEMA feels like that they can have better pricing by going straight to the source.

When those 100,000-plus units -- worth roughly $1.5 billion -- hit the open market, dealerships across America noticed anyone could sell these units. A dealership might have had lost business to an auctioneer down the street, a pop up lot selling them or individuals selling them without any worries that a dealership might have. Most were sold as is as the sellers believed they could simply double their money and close up shop. Other buyers had some repairs done and then sold the units themselves. Anyway you look at it, the dealership lost sales and were left with repair jobs on these units. 2010, was one of the worst years for sells in all industries.

Since 2009, FEMA has purchased roughly $4 billion worth of "emergency housing units" from a select few manufacturers. These units mainly are called park models or mobile homes according to FEMA, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the titles that came with the units. However, by law, park models can not be larger than 400 square feet, and these units were built to FEMA's specifications that required them to be larger than 400 square feet.

Disaster victims are using most of these units in early 2012. The dealerships and the manufacturers should start to see these units hit the open market beginning in late 2012 and through 2014. FEMA will have to refill their stock as they sell these units. Unfortunately, FEMA will not purchase any from RV dealerships.

If a dealership is in some kind of natural disaster and is destroyed, they should close their doors. Even with the Stafford Act, FEMA already has the units it needs from the manufacturers, so do not count on FEMA buying any units from a local dealership.

Not only does FEMA have roughly $4 billion in inventory about to hit the open market, the dealerships and the manufacturers will also have to deal with the units that were sold by FEMA in 2010 that will be used as trade-ins. I have had several people purchase a RV during the selling of these units. One person had purchased a 2006 Cardinal travel Trailer that was fully loaded with two slideouts and included holding tanks for $3,600. I looked up the trade-in value of his unit and found that the value is worth $25,000. These units could be traded in by accident. Remember that a dealership can still be sued, or the dealer arrested under the Title 18, Section 1001, the United States Code for selling a 2010 FEMA unit that was designated unfit for habitation.

As I look at the future of these industries, I wonder how a dealership can order new units from a manufacturer and compete against FEMA at the same time. Why should someone come to a dealership to look at a $20,000 travel trailer when they can purchase a $5,000 or $10,000 dollar park model down the street? These units will hit the open market soon. I know this because FEMA cannot afford to store these units. This is how they were able to sell them in 2010.

Although RV manufactures might not be

 

 

Rating
Due to unrelenting spam, RV Daily Report will only allow comments on stories from registered users. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Comments
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
Are titles from FEMA marked salvage or unfit for habitation? How will a dealer realize that it is a FEMA trailer if it has all the tanks etc. Any ideas how to avoid this potential<br />lawsuit or worse?
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
FEMA trailers: The gift that keeps on taking year after year <br />Jul 13 <br /><br />Written by: Greg Gerber <br />7/13/2009 12:55 PM <br /><br />If a private business tried this, the owners would be tossed in jail tomorrow.<br />FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency -- the guys who redefined government inefficiency during hurricanes Katrina and Rita -- continues to cause problems for the RV industry.<br />The agency is now unloading scores of its "surplus" travel trailers purchased a year or two ago as emergency shelters for hurricane victims. One individual in Maine plans to sell more than 80 of the units from a shopping mall for between $6,950 and $9,950. In fact, just about anyone can buy one of the units by visiting www.gsaauctions.gov, clicking on the "Trailers, Tractors and Manufactured Housing" link on the left side, and selecting whichever unit they would like to buy.<br />Here's the problem. Are they new or used units?<br />I looked at some 2009 TL Industries units today. There are a bunch of 2008 models as well. They look good on paper. Buyers must sign a disclosure stating they understand the unit may be emitting formaldehyde, and they have to get their own financing. But, it looks like someone can walk away with a nice bargain.<br />It is an especially good bargain if the unit is truly used because an unscrupulous seller, or unsuspecting buyer may be able to obtain a new factory warranty on the unit.<br />Each unit built by an RV manufacturer comes with a certificate of origin, or birth certificate, as Bill Garpow, executive director of the Recreational Park Trailer Industry Association, likes to call them.<br />In normal circumstances, the certificate is held by the manufacturer or a finance company until a unit is sold and then the certificate of origin is converted to an official title.<br />However, the federal government never took title of the units they bought. Consequently, they will issue what is known as a Standard Form 97 or SF-97 -- something they give whenever they sell a vehicle. The form contains a blank for an odometer reading. That way people buying a car or truck from the federal government would know that if it is new or used by the amount of miles on the odometer.<br />Unfortunately, odometers weren't installed in the travel trailers used by FEMA. And since the SF-97 doesn't contain a box to indicate if the unit is new or used, it's up to the buyer to figure that out. In fact, buyers can simply take the SF-97 to their local department of motor vehicles office and get a brand new first-time title for the unit.<br />What comes with the title? A new warranty and lemon law protection. For the RV industry, this practice is opening up a whole can of worms, especially for suppliers.<br />Brad Sargent, with Dometic, described the situation this way. He said basically people are buying a unit that has never been sold before, but has been lived in for three years.<br />If warranty work had been performed by a FEMA contractor, the supplier's warranty clock would have started ticking when the repairs were done. However, if a new buyer gets a brand new title for the trailer, it is likely he will assume the unit has never been used and that the original warranties still apply. But, if he encounters a problem with the same appliance and submits it for warranty repair, he will be very surprised to discover that the warranty had run out years earlier. And that would leave the supplier companies in a very uncomfortable situation.<br />Garpow said his group is attempting to get FEMA to appreciate the situation in which RV businesses find themselves. He said the agency's reception has been lukewarm, but they are looking into it -- as is the government affairs department at the RV Industry Association.<br />One dealer I talked with this morning was concerned about
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
"Welcome to my world" having been an RV dealer in Mobile, Alabama for over 35 years, this story does not surprise me. I have had auction after auction just a few miles from my front door! This problem with FEMA trailers started back in 2005! selective buying from politically connected dealers/non-dealers, scam after scam and finally GREEDY manufacturer's brought this situation upon all RV dealers located on the Gulf Coast. It does not surprise me that FEMA will dump this garbage on us yet again, none the less we are still trying to recover from the Screwing we have taken here on the gulf coast from BP OIL!! Thanks FEMA we have the vasoline ready!! GO AHEAD MAKE MY DAY!
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
Texas woman facing charges over sale of scrap trailers<br />By TEXARKANA GAZETTE<br /><br />TEXARKANA — Six counts of felony theft of property have been filed in Arkansas against a Texarkana, Texas, woman on accusations that she sold FEMA trailers as livable housing units when they were classified as scrap, records show.<br /><br />Cindy Wade, 58, will make her first appearance Tuesday in Little River County Circuit Court. If convicted, theft of property carries a potential sentence of five to 20 years in prison and a maximum fine of $15,000 or both.<br /><br />Wade was arrested earlier this week at the Little River County sheriff ’s office in Ashdown. She posted $10,000 bond and was released.<br /><br />The investigation involved mobile homes originally purchased by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for use in natural disasters. In 2009, FEMA began reducing its inventory of mobile homes to save money on storage costs.<br /><br />The Wade investigation began June 2, 2009, when the General Services Administration’s Office of the Inspector General received information from the Arkansas attorney general’s office about a complaint against Wade selling the FEMA mobile homes to individuals “as livable units” when the mobile homes were classified as scrap. The person complaining was not listed in the arrest affidavit.<br /><br />The inspector general’s office contacted the General Services Administration’s property management division and confirmed that Wade, serving as manager ofJ-LU Limited Co., purchased 15 mobile homes in three GSA auctions.<br /><br />Wade purportedly told the “complainant” that the mobile homes could be used as housing, according to the affidavit.<br /><br />The General Services Administration auction website states that “the mobile homes were not to be used for housing,” according to the arrest affidavit.<br /><br />Records at the General Services Administration’s property division show Wade signed a buyer’s certification after each of the three sales indicating the mobile homes would not be used for housing.<br /><br />“The buyer’s certification indicates Wade is supposed to inform subsequent buyers the mobile homes were not to be used as housing and provide buyers with the accompanying documentation,” according to the arrest affidavit.<br /><br />The arrest affidavit shows that General Services Administration officers interviewed at least six people between Oct. 28, 2009, and July 22, 2010, who had purchased mobile homes from Wade.<br /><br />Although all of the purchasers apparently received bills of sale, none received titles to the mobile homes, according to the affidavit. None of the people said he received any additional documents when the sales were completed, and none said he was told that the mobile homes could not be lived in.<br />
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
Full Disclosure Not Working; Unsuspecting Consumers Buying Katrina Fema Trailers<br />12:02 AM, Nov 24, 2010<br /><br />ELLIJAY, GA - Our Center for Investigative Action warned you about it. Remember those FEMA trailers that were used to house Katrina victims, then were pulled when high levels of formaldehyde were found? They ultimately were allowed back on the market, after the government assured us that there would be full disclosure whenever they were resold. However, we now know, that's not happening. <br /><br />53 year old Dan Hicks of Ellijay is now facing criminal charges accused of not being honest about what he was selling. <br /><br />Cynthia Palis of Central, South Carolina bought a trailer from Hicks in June for more than 5 grand and says she had no idea it was one of those trailers we had warned you about. <br /><br />She contacted us, after seeing our original story, asking for more information. We checked the vehicle identification number of her camper trailer against the Feds data base and learned the truth.<br /><br />"I'm pissed!" Palis said. "According to the person I bought it from, they had been camping in it and now his children had gone to college and they weren't camping in it anymore," she told us while sitting on the steps of her trailer, now parked in her yard.<br /><br />We learned the government had sold her trailer back to the public in January and then it was resold 5 times before being sold to her. Gilmer County Sheriff's Detective, Ryan Hilton investigated Palis's complaint and told us everyone down the line said they had disclosed it was a FEMA trailer, except Hicks. <br /><br /> <br /><br />"He's being charged with deceitful business practices which is a Georgia statute and also theft by deception, another Georgia Statute," Detective Hilton said. <br /><br /> <br /><br />"The trailer itself was conveyed to him as being a former FEMA trailer and he bought several of them from the same company." <br /><br />"So he knew?" I asked.<br /><br />"He knew. Absolutely." Detective Hilton responded.<br /><br /> <br /><br />We don't know what Hicks knew because he wouldn't talk to us.<br /><br /> <br /><br />According to charging documents, Hicks is also accused of misrepresenting the year of the trailer. <br /><br />Palis didn't get her money back but she's glad we have told her story. <br /><br />"I feel better but I'm still out my money, but if it can help other people from going through the same thing what we've gone through that would be great to me."<br />
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
I went to Jackson MS in March 2009 to look at units that were coming to auction. I went in and out of about 300 units. Most all of them had some form of water damage. Most of them had no roof vents. Some of the brand new never used units had life forms living in them like I have never seen. Well after that I thought if they could be bought for @ 2000 per unit that I might still be able to make some money. It turned out that most of those units sold for 5000 to 8000. They were bought by individual bidders during the online auction. I made my decision that day. I will not by a FEMA trailer for any price and I will not take one in trade. We all know the Katrina trailers were either 04,05 or 06s. So my advice is to not take them in trade and do not sell them. But do tell your prospects of the hidden dangers if they are considering one. Travel trailer buyers for the most part are either payment buyers or low price buyers. If they buy a FEMA trailer and need service we will still take their money. Plus the FEMA spec trailers have no tanks and they were bought new by the government for @ 6000.00 per. unit. Those trailers should be piled up and burnt then sold for scrap.
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
I think large posters describing this problem should be provided to every dealership in the country. Perhaps the folders could be funded out of the Go RVing money as a public service to unsuspecting consumers. This will also provide a level of protection for dealers when an irate customer comes in expecting service or a large trade-in on the FEMA trailers. This is another sad day for the RV industry and the damage it will bring on dealers, who always seem to be on the short end of situations like this.
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
I'm sure FEMA has a "butt" load of inventory, but (if I had to guess) I don't think RV "buyers" who are looking to spend $7000 or less on an RV are legitimate RV buyers anyway. RV's are luxury items. Some people don't have any (financial) business buying an RV. An RV for $7000 (in my experience thus far) is a rare item at a dealership. ALOT of these FEMA trailers will probably be parked and poorly maintenanced which will cause them to have problems. The owner will them buy RV repair services and/or parts. Good business for dealerships!
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
What is the liablity of Servicing one of these Units? Last month there were 3 of these units that caught Fire, one died. If an RV Dealership services one of these units, Does the Dealership take responsibility of the unit?
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
What is the liablity of Servicing one of these Units? Last month there were 3 of these units that caught Fire, one died. If an RV Dealership services one of these units, Does the Dealership take responsibility of the unit?
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
We were sold a fema Mobile Home in 2010. We were not advised that it was a formal FEMA Mobile Home, and told nothing about Formaldehyde in it. We were told that it had been tested and it passed. As we were signing the paper work to purchase it, the seller threw a peace of paper in to all the other papers, saying, "that we had to sign this and it was nothing more than what they had told us about the unit. As we signed it but before we could read it, the seller of this unit grabbed it and put it with the other papers that we had signed. We were buying it on a Contract for deed. They did tell us it was a fema Mobile Home or that it was bought at auction in Florida. We never thought anymore about it, but a few months later I had to have a cist removed from the cartage of my nose. John, my husband several month later from moving in, had to be put on oxygen 24/7 he went from 98% oxygen Level to 82% the doctors could not understand why his oxygen was doing so good, and then turned so fast. I have been in the hosp several time for bronchitis and pneumonia.<br />Our 4 year old daughter has had sever stomach pain. We reach out to everyone we knew but got no help. We found out that this is a Morgan Fleetwood Mobile Home and according to research we did, found out that it was one that was GSA/FEMA had sold. Later found it was at the auction, and GSA knew that this unit was never tested for anything! While at my daughters doctor one day, we told him about the Mobile Home being a FEMA unit. He wrote on a pad the instructions of my family not to take our daughter back to our home. He contracted the State Dept. of Health to have it tested! While living in a motel for one month while working the the State Dept. to test it. The day finaly came! With in one day of test the State Health Dept. told us that we have black mold and a Formaldehyde level of 150 ppm. The Health Department wants us to keep it at 72 year round, with the windows open! I am not living like this! My husband has developed colon cancer and my daughter still goes to the doctor on regular basis.<br /><br />I hope that no one else may have to go through what my family is having to!<br /><br />Sharon Stinson
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
We were sold a fema Mobile Home in 2010. We were not advised that it was a formal FEMA Mobile Home, and told nothing about Formaldehyde in it. We were told that it had been tested and it passed. As we were signing the paper work to purchase it, the seller threw a peace of paper in to all the other papers, saying, "that we had to sign this and it was nothing more than what they had told us about the unit. As we signed it but before we could read it, the seller of this unit grabbed it and put it with the other papers that we had signed. We were buying it on a Contract for deed. They did tell us it was a fema Mobile Home or that it was bought at auction in Florida. We never thought anymore about it, but a few months later I had to have a cist removed from the cartage of my nose. John, my husband several month later from moving in, had to be put on oxygen 24/7 he went from 98% oxygen Level to 82% the doctors could not understand why his oxygen was doing so good, and then turned so fast. I have been in the hosp several time for bronchitis and pneumonia.<br />Our 4 year old daughter has had sever stomach pain. We reach out to everyone we knew but got no help. We found out that this is a Morgan Fleetwood Mobile Home and according to research we did, found out that it was one that was GSA/FEMA had sold. Later found it was at the auction, and GSA knew that this unit was never tested for anything! While at my daughters doctor one day, we told him about the Mobile Home being a FEMA unit. He wrote on a pad the instructions of my family not to take our daughter back to our home. He contracted the State Dept. of Health to have it tested! While living in a motel for one month while working the the State Dept. to test it. The day finaly came! With in one day of test the State Health Dept. told us that we have black mold and a Formaldehyde level of 150 ppm. The Health Department wants us to keep it at 72 year round, with the windows open! I am not living like this! My husband has developed colon cancer and my daughter still goes to the doctor on regular basis.<br /><br />I hope that no one else may have to go through what my family is having to!<br /><br />Sharon Stinson
#
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:31 PM
Any RV dealership working on a FEMA unit is assuming the same liability they would be if they were working on a unit sold from their lot. Garage-keepers liability does not/can not discriminate between the 2 units unless there is an exclusion in the policy for work completed on FEMA units. Just my two cents...

Name (required)

Email (required)

CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above:

 

Home    News    Opinion    Social    Product News    Videos    About Us    Jobs
Privacy Statement     Terms Of Use
Copyright 2012 by RV Daily Report